Blind Americans….

Eye-for-an-eye-makes-the-world-blind

I get the point.  We can’t be spending all our time trying for payback.  The insanity has to end sometime and why shouldn’t it begin with me?  Revenge is all-consuming and a distraction from making real progress.  I get it, but here’s the rub.

If you put out my eye and there are no consequences, what’s to stop you from putting out my other eye?  There has to be some penalty for your bad behavior to stop you from doing it again.

Democrats haven’t figured this out yet.  We look weak when we turn the other cheek (see Barack Obama), but open ourselves to hypocrisy when we act like Republicans after criticizing them for their actions.  I fear Progressives are just following Republican’s actions.  We are starting to hear repudiation of the “when they go low, we go high” philosophy, but without an alternate course of action that doesn’t result in taking out another eye.

Does somebody have an idea?  I’m tired of looking weak, feeling bad and losing.

An open letter to progressives

Obama_Thomas_c0-283-1650-1245_s885x516

Starry-eyed Democrats,

The two most consequential governmental jobs in the last 30 years that African Americans attained- the Supreme Court and the Presidency- were, in many ways, the result of affirmative action.  Both men were inexperienced and less qualified than others for their position.  But their race mattered at that particular point in time, so they got the job.  Both men caused and are still causing harm to this country- Thomas for his votes on the Supreme Court and Obama for what he didn’t do and continues not to do (nothing).

I won’t get into Clarence Thomas’ story.  It’s well known that he was unqualified, having little time as a judge.  But it was Thurgood Marshall’s seat that was vacant.  Thomas had the right political philosophy and right skin color to both satisfy conservatives and enough in the African American community to provide Bush-1 cover.

But Obama’s story needs some discussion.

In 2008, Hillary Clinton was the more qualified candidate.  She had more time in the Senate and eight years as first lady where she got a first-hand view of how the presidency works, plus she unsuccessfully developed “Clinton-care” in 1996 which certainly was an education on the adversarial relationship between the executive and Republican legislative branches of government.  Bill’s impeachment just reinforced it.

So why didn’t she get the job?  Either choice would have been historic.  Either the first woman president or first African American president.  But the base usually decides primary elections and they chose Obama.  But why?

Progressives, you are nothing but idealistic.  You knew Hillary was more qualified, but you thought (hoped?) that an African American in the White House would accelerate the end racism in America.  Discrimination of women, especially white women, wasn’t as severe as that of African Americans, so that glass ceiling could wait.  Obama was also relatively untouched by the culture of Washington and would be more likely to implement policies that didn’t have the PAC’s and large corporation’s fingerprints all over them (ha, ha!).  Hillary was a creature of Washington.  So, for these and some other reasons, she was thrown under the bus in favor of Obama.

Progressives, if you thought that Obama could end racism and that racism was more important than an economic meltdown AND two wars, then you are not idealistic.  You are dangerously naïve and put this country on a path to what we have today.

Experience counts.  Knowledge counts.  Hillary was ready to go on day one had she won.  Obama, though very smart, wasn’t as prepared.  Hillary and her 27 point plans were made for a time like 2009.  Obama’s inexperience in Washington, who some thought was an advantage, resulted in his administration spinning its wheels, failing to get traction. He burned through three chiefs of staff in his first term.  He spent too much time getting his bearings and appealing to Republicans.  At the very least, he didn’t have enough time to campaign in the 2010 midterms and Democrats got “shellacked”.

There are earlier posts and more to come describing the failings of the Obama administration, so I won’t go into particulars here other than to say that race relations are worse now than they were in 2009, admittedly due to a manufactured backlash against him.  He was a high-stakes gamble that didn’t pay-off and we are now paying the price.

If Obama had eight more years of government experience, either in the Senate or in the cabinet (vice president?), he would have been very qualified for the job as president.  Obama’s time should have been 2016.  I think deep down he knows this.

Progressives: Obama and all that followed is your responsibility.  Learn this lesson for 2020.

The Journey Begins

Thanks for joining me!

No one listens to me, so I am joining the blogosphere (where no one will read me).  I’ve also recently retired and have plenty of time on my hands. I hope you find some of my musings interesting.

About me:

I’ve lived in red states nearly my entire life.

I was a Republican because my family was Republican, but quit voting that way after 1980.  Reagan was the last straw following so closely after Watergate.

I used to be an evangelical (Southern Baptist).  But since I am no longer a Republican, I can’t be a “real” evangelical.

I am educated and had good jobs my entire career, though I have been “RIF’d”.  I don’t fear immigrants.  I welcome them.  The immigration issue is solvable in a fair and humane way.

I voted for Obama twice, but for Hillary in my state’s primary in 2008.  I donated more money to him than any other candidate ever.  I voted for Hillary in 2016.

I support gay rights, DACA, the Paris accords and Iran nuclear agreement and ESPECIALLY campaign finance reform.

Sensible gun laws don’t mean the end of the 2nd amendment, though that wouldn’t be too bad if that happened.

I’m undecided, but leaning against, legalizing marijuana.  I’ve seen what chronic use does to people and I don’t trust most people to manage their use.

I give to charities and donate my time in service.

As much as I support Bernie’s positions, I believe he is more of an insurgent than a leader.  Bernie’s strengths lie in moving the establishment candidates in the right (correct) direction.  He would be a terrible president because he wouldn’t know how to develop or implement his programs, or have the support to do so.  His supporters were sore losers.

I believe that voters are looking for strength and confidence in their candidates.  Discussing the details and hedging your positions on camera makes you look phony, weak and indecisive.

I believe the situation in the Country is the responsibility of Democrats.  They didn’t hold Republicans accountable, don’t know the difference between a political argument and a legal one, are too worried about process and didn’t vote.